“The Sunday Political Brunch” - May 29

Sunday, May 29, 2016

 

View Larger +

We’re on the road again this weekend in the Keystone State of Pennsylvania. A number of polls out this week show it could be a dead-even Presidential race in November between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. But all kinds of factors can evolve between now and then to influence the outcome. Let’s “brunch” on that this week:

“October Surprise” – This gets talked about every election cycle, but in my recollection has never happened. There is always supposed to be some lurid detail lurking about a candidate at the last minute that is supposed to come out and torpedo their chances to win the White House. About the closest we ever got was the revelation the Sunday before Election Day in 2000, that George W. Bush got a DUI in Maine many years earlier. It’s unlikely it was a factor in the election’s outcome.

“Running Mate Choice” – I don’t believe it has ever been shown empirically that a vice presidential running mate swung the ticket for any candidate and got them into the White House. Still, some VP choices have hurt the ticket, i.e. Tom Eagleton, Dan Quayle (though they won), and Sarah Palin. But this year it’s a more delicate dance. Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have historically high unfavorable ratings. Plus Trump will be 70 in June, Clinton will be 69 in October, and Bernie Sanders will be 75 in September. We’ve never at a field this old! A healthy substitute may be an important consideration for voters!

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

“Financial Market Meltdown” – No one can predict the ebb and flow of financial markets, or else we would all be millionaires! The collapse of Lehman Brothers and the subsequent financial market meltdown in September 2008, is what caused John McCain to lose the election to Barack Obama. Until that day, McCain was ahead, and the next day it flip-flopped, never to return in McCain’s favor. A lot can happen between May and November, and remember most people are prone to vote their pocketbooks.

“Debate Performance” – Debates matter. Just ask former President Jimmy Carter. He won in 1976 – in part – on the strength of his debating against President Ford. Carter scored points coming across as an “honest outsider” with no ties to Washington, after the Watergate era. Ford also had a bad debate gaffe about communist domination of Eastern Europe that hurt him. Fast forward to 1980, and Carter was crushed in the debates by an aggressive, confident Ronald Reagan. In fact, Carter was well ahead before their debates began, but once the debates were over, Carter was finished.

“Unforeseen Events” – Things can happen on the national and international stage that can suddenly swing the public mood. The Iranian hostage crisis that began one year before his reelection bid, badly crippled President Carter in 1980. The degree to which the anti-war movement attacked President Johnson in the mid-to-late 1960s, and then prompted opposition from within his own party, ended his reelection bid in 1968. There has been critical news recently about former Secretary Clinton’s private email server. Will that cause her further political grief? Stay tuned.

“The Public Mood” – We know the public mood is unsettling on both sides of the aisle this year. Usually one party or the other is mad about something, and is in a foul mood. Never have I seen both parties in such an internal uproar at the very same time, which explains the Trump-Sanders phenomenon. After the West Virginia primary, the CBS News exit polling showed that 44 percent of Sanders’s supporters, said they would vote for Trump in November if Hillary Clinton won the Democratic nomination. That is stunning, and unprecedented in U.S. Presidential politics. Whether they hold to that pledge in November remains to be seen.

“The Bottom Line” – This is anyone’s race to win. People in the Clinton campaign who think it’s in the bag, are dangerously overconfident. And Trump’s backers think he can steamroll Clinton, as he did the 16 other Republican candidates he faced in the primary. Overconfidence can be political suicide. I have a friend in public office who once told me, “No matter what, I always run as if the polls have me six points behind!” She is one of the best retail politicians I have ever met, and she hasn’t lost an election yet. Wise words!

Who will win this year’s Presidential election? Tell me who and why by clicking the comment button at www.MarkCurtisMedia.com

 

Related Slideshow: Presidential Candidate’s Social Media - 2016

View Larger +
Prev Next

Trump Facebook

5.73 Million

View Larger +
Prev Next

Trump Twitter

6.19 Million

View Larger +
Prev Next

Trump Klout

88 Score

View Larger +
Prev Next

Cruz Facebook

1.9 Million

View Larger +
Prev Next

Cruz Twitter

819,000

View Larger +
Prev Next

Cruz Klout

89 Score

View Larger +
Prev Next

Rubio Facebook

1.28 Million

View Larger +
Prev Next

Rubio Twitter

1.17 Million

View Larger +
Prev Next

Rubio Klout

81 Score

View Larger +
Prev Next

Kasich Facebook

178,000

View Larger +
Prev Next

Kasich Twitter

175,000

View Larger +
Prev Next

Kasich Klout

87 Score

View Larger +
Prev Next

Bush Facebook

329,000

View Larger +
Prev Next

Bush Twitter

476,000

View Larger +
Prev Next

Bush Klout

80 Score

View Larger +
Prev Next

Carson Facebook

5.07 Million

View Larger +
Prev Next

Carson Twitter

1.13 Million

View Larger +
Prev Next

Carson Klout

80 Score

View Larger +
Prev Next

Clinton Facebook

2.46 Million

View Larger +
Prev Next

Clinton Twitter

5.4 Million

View Larger +
Prev Next

Clinton Klout

94 Score

View Larger +
Prev Next

Sanders Facebook

3.10 Million

View Larger +
Prev Next

Sanders Twitter

1.44 Million

View Larger +
Prev Next

Sanders Klout

84 Score

 
 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
 

Sign Up for the Daily Eblast

I want to follow on Twitter

I want to Like on Facebook