Moore: Politifact’s Media Narrative Towards Russia Showed Bias

Monday, March 20, 2017
Russell J. Moore GoLocal MINDSETTER™

Lincoln Chafee at work
As far as the truth is concerned, it’s a good thing that the Providence Journal has discontinued its Politifact feature.

On the local level, the Politifact articles normally were anything but fact-based, and would just cite facts that backed up the opinion of the writer who was supposedly assessing the truth of a statement. On the national level, it wasn’t much better. (Politifact was just a national branding, of local media reporters, acting as universal arbiters of truth.)

Set that view aside, however, and Politifact serves as a good example of the mainstream, legacy media creates its own narratives, and then cherrypicks facts that support that story line.

They're much more monolithic than one would imagine. The reporters sit around tweeting back and forth at one another like they're in an echo chamber or a group of cool kids sitting in a high school cafeteria.

For instance, the story line of how the mainstream media and the Democrats have worked together, over the last year or so, to try and stoke a new Cold War, is a very good example this dynamic. (Today, any connection to Russia or an expressed desire for better relations with the country is regarded with suspicion, at best, and evidence of potentially treasonous behavior, at worst.)

Political Opinions, With Facts as Backup

That wasn’t always the case. To make this point, look no further than Politifact.

Long before Donald Trump burst onto the national scene in a big way, and even before Mitt Romney was derided for claiming that Russia was a threat to American interests during the 2012 Presidential election, the legacy/mainstream media regarded news reports tying American politicians to individuals with ties to Russian government officials with skepticism.

So when, in the early days of GoLocalProv, during the 2010 gubernatorial election in Rhode Island, GoLocal published a report that detailed the fact that Lincoln Chafee consulted to a foundation (for tens of thousands of dollars), “The Center For Effective Governance” which was founded by Ukrainian oligarch Rinat Akhmetov, Politifact was critical. Akhmetov had some questionable past dealings and was suspected by many in his country of serious crimes, GoLocal reported.

The Providence Journal Politifact story report downplayed Chafee’s connections to Akhmetov, and pointed out that the Russian billionaire oligarch had never been arrested or charged with a crime. The Politifact story wasn’t interested in Ahkmetov’s ties to Putin, apparently, since they weren’t mentioned.

Changing storylines

“All we found were suspicions, suggestions, innuendo, and conspiracy theories circulating in the rough-and-tumble world of an emerging Ukrainian democracy,” the Providence Journal wrote in its Politifact feature, referencing facts cited in a GoLocal article about Akhmetov.  

Can anyone imagine the media taking this type of stance against any of the innuendo or conspiracy theories about Trump’s Russian ties?

Yet that was in 2010. Remember, this was long before Russian hysteria had hit a boiling points in America because the Democrats and the media needed an angle to disparage Trump.

Today, suspicions, suggestions, innuendo, and conspiracy theories, particularly when they come from unnamed sources in “the intelligence community” are treated as Gospel truths.

For instance, last year, Politifact (the national bureau) took a much keener interest in Akhmetov. Specifically, the publication decided to take a look into his connections to Paul Manafort, who was Trump’s campaign manager last summer.

The Russian Connection

In that story from 2016, when candidate Donald Trump hired Paul Manafort to run his campaign, Akhmetov was featured in the story as a high profile Russian businessman with connections to Vladimir Putin. Remember: at that time, (even moreso now) the media, particularly the national media, was busy portraying Putin as a grave threat to the United States, in an attempt to torpedo Trump and benefit Hillary Clinton.

“Paul Manafort, the adviser hired by Donald Trump to add stability and institutional know-how to Trump’s often scattershot presidential campaign, has long and deep reported ties to pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine,” the Politifact report reads.

That’s a much different narrative. In this media narrative, 6 years later, Akhmetov is cast in a much more negative light.  

Akhmetov is characterized as a Vladimir Putin loyalist, who recommended Manafort work with Ukrainian Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych in an attempt to help him stay in power.

“Akhmetov, however, also was a supporter of Viktor Yanukovych, the country’s prime minister, a leader of the Party of Regions and an ally of Vladimir Putin. Yanukovych became president in 2010, but fled under escort to Russia after Ukraine’s 2014 revolution,” wrote Politifact.

Manaforts Russian Ties More Important?

The article implies that Trump’s hiring of Manafort suggests some subversive Russian ties between the campaign and the foreign power. It’s also worth noting that this article was printed long before the Russian hysteria hit a fever pitch.

The two examples show that as the legacy media’s narrative often evolves, certain facts or circumstances that would otherwise be overlooked are instead highlighted.

Along the same lines, Chafee caused a media uproar last month when he suggested that warmer ties with Russia weren’t necessarily a bad thing (a position he’s long held). Yet when GoLocal reported on his ties to a pro-Russian oligarch in 2010, the mainstream, legacy media published a highly critical report...of GoLocal. Go figure.

All of this shows why the media will continue to undergo its decentralization and folks begin to turn to alternative sources of information in order to get the facts.

Increasingly, the gatekeepers in the legacy media have less to guard, since folks can get the information from more unbiased, alternative sources.

We don’t need “Politifact” to do our thinking for us.

Russell Moore has worked on both sides of the desk in Rhode Island media, both for newspapers and on political campaigns. Send him email at [email protected]. Follow him on twitter @russmoore713.

  • WINNER: Defense Industry

    The biggest winner in the Trump budget is military spending and correspondingly, many of Rhode Island’s largest private employers will see dramatic increased in spending.

    General Dynamics/Electric Boat, Raytheon, and the Aquidneck Island defense-related companies will all see increase funding and Rhode Island will see job growth

    Total Increase: $54 Billion

    Rhode Island Impact: Unknown

     
  • LOSER: RIPBS and RINPR

    Rhode Island’s public radio and television will be zeroed out of federal funding in FY18 under Trump's budget. 

    RIPBS’ General Manager David Piccerelli confirmed on Thursday that if the budget is adopted, the station would lose over $700,000, but said he is hopeful that funding can be restored. 

    In late February he appeared on GoLocal LIVE to talk about the importance of public broadcasting in Rhode Island. 

    According to the Corporation of Public Broadcasting, here is the funding to RI -- which would be cut. 

    Eliminates All Funding: $445 million

    Rhode Island Impact: Eliminates all funding

    Including all RI support

    Other System Support

    $14,002

    Radio Community Service Grant

    $204,922

    Television Community Service Grant

    $730,878

    Grand Total

    $949,802

     
  • WINNER: Veterans

    Veterans' programs see a major boost in the Trump budget proposal — an increase of more than 6%.

    The budget would make some major improvements to the funding structure for many veteran programs. “Trump’s budget plan also provides $4.6 billion in new funding 'for VA health care to improve patient access and timeliness of medical care services for over nine million enrolled veterans,' but offered few specifics on what that will entail,” said Military Times.

    Total Increase: $4.4B (+6% change)

    Rhode Island Impact: Unknown

     
  • LOSER: National Endowment for the Humanities

    The Trump budget would eliminate all funding for the National Endowment for the Humanities. The agency's Chairman William D. Adams released the following statement on Thursday afternoon:

    “We are greatly saddened to learn of this proposal for elimination, as NEH has made significant contributions to the public good over its 50-year history.  But as an agency of the executive branch, we answer to the President and the Office of Management and Budget (OMBTherefore, we must abide by this budget request as this initial stage of the federal budget process gets under way. It will be up to Congress over the next several months to determine funding levels for fiscal year 2018. We will work closely with OMB in the coming months as the budget process continues. The agency is continuing its normal operations at this time."

    Between 2008 and 2012, institutions and individuals in Rhode Island received $6.4 million, according to NEH. Programs funded included Brown’s John Carter Library, which was awarded $270,000 to support a fellowship program for NEH designated scholars. 

    Eliminates All Funding: $148 million

    Rhode Island Impact: Eliminates all funding

     
  • LOSER: Environmental Protection Agency

    One of the federal agencies hardest hit by Trump's budget is the EPA. 

    The EPA lab in Narragansett as well as clean-up programs like Superfund will be impacted.

    The Washington Post reports, “Trump's budget begins to dismantle the EPA, shrinking its funding by 31 percent and eliminating a fifth of its workforce. More than 50 programs would be eliminated altogether, including Energy Star; grants that help states and cities fight air pollution; an office focused on environmental justice and cleanup efforts in the Chesapeake Bay and Great Lakes; and infrastructure assistance to Alaskan native villages and along the Mexican border. Funding for drinking water infrastructure would remain intact, but the agency's scientific research would suffer massive cuts.”

    “Hollowing out the EPA will leave communities at the mercy of big polluters and signal surrender in the fight against catastrophic climate change. How exactly does allowing industrial plants to pollute our air and drinking water put America first?  How does hamstringing our diplomatic corps put America first?” said U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse in a statement on Thursday. 

    Total Decrease $2.5B (-31% change)

    Rhode Island Impact: Unknown

     
  • WINNER: Homeland Security

    Federal agencies will win under the Trump budget, including funding for a beefed up border. Funding will go to “build a border wall, for 500 new Border Patrol agents, and 1,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.”

    However, certain RI state agencies, local police and emergency agencies will see cuts. According to the Washington Post, the budget "cuts $667 million from grant programs to state and local agencies, including pre-disaster mitigation grants and counterterrorism funding.”  Total impacts on Rhode Island are unknown.

    Total Increase $2.8B (+7% change)

    Rhode Island impact: Unknown

     
  • LOSER: National Endowment for the Arts

    If Rhode Island is anything, it may be the "Arts State". And arts are getting slashed under Trump's budget. 

    National Endowment for the Arts Chairman Jane Chu said, "Today we learned that the President’s FY 2018 budget blueprint proposes the elimination of the National Endowment for the Arts. We are disappointed because we see our funding actively making a difference with individuals of all ages in thousands of communities, large, small, urban and rural, and in every Congressional District in the nation."

    For everthing from Trinity Rep to public art projects -- the budget cuts will dramatically change the funding available for arts groups.

    Eliminates All Funding: $148 million

    Rhode Island Impact: Eliminates all funding

     
  • LOSER: Commerce Department

    The Trump budget would hit some key programs that impact Rhode Island that are funded via the Commerce Department — these include coastal research programs, and efforts like the Rhode Island Sea Grant which is one of 33 programs across the country “working to enhance environmental stewardship and long-term economic development and responsible use of coastal and marine resources.”

    Also getting slashed in the proposed budget is the Economic Development Administration, which has been targeted for decades. U.S. Senator John Chafee called for the elimination of the program and called it “pork” back in the 1980s.

    Senator Whitehouse criticized the cuts to funding for NOAA, “Slashing the NOAA budget will take away resources from our coastal economy in Rhode Island.”

    Total Decrease $1.4B (-16% change)

    Rhode Island Impact: Unknown

     
Delivered Free Every
Day to Your Inbox