Dear Senator Whitehouse: You Can Walk Back Your Support of Power Plant “Process”

Thursday, July 27, 2017

 

View Larger +

Sheldon Whitehouse

Dear Senator Whitehouse,

Reading your poll numbers lately, a lot of us wonder, "Why, with your outspoken views on protecting the environment, do you continue to support 'the process' for approving the Clear River Energy Center?"

As Capitol Hill's "Senator Environment," wouldn't it be embarrassing if the Energy Facilities Siting Board approved the plant next January, and by Election Day, splashed all over the media, we saw the cranes in the air towering over the pines of the Pulaski-George Washington State Forest, and the other five state forests contiguous with it, plus the Buck Hill Boy Scout and Feinstein Cub Scout reservations to boot? Lands that have taken the taxpayer two generations and millions of dollars to acquire for the proctection of wildlife and their own outdoor recreation?

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Wouldn't I'd be lovin' that if I were a Republican?

Ok, we understand the point you always make first whenever we buttonhole you and ask why you won't speak against the project: "It's a State issue and I don't want to meddle." Alright, we buy that. But on the second point you make, that the "the process” the EFSB follows is a fair and thorough one... Not at all. You might as well go poke a yellow jacket's nest as continue to defend that absurdity. Fortunately, though, you now have some running room to recant that, thanks to a downfield block the Governor threw for you three weeks ago right here in GoLocal.

Excoriated by the power plant opposition for her gushing initial support for the plant, and having the smarts, at last, to read the political tea leaves, Gina issued an extraordinary mea culpa. She apologized to power plant opponents for appearing  to have put her “thumb on the scale” of the EFSB process. Moreover, she implied very clearly that she would be cozy and comfortable with the EFSB's final decision should it indeed be thumbs down for the plant. Only deference to the Laborer's Union, no doubt, prevented her from using the word "delighted!"

So Senator, take the snap and run. Without dissing the power plant itself, you too can walk back your support for "the process." Because from any angle you look at it, it's  a rotten one.

View Larger +

The Energy Facility Siting Board process is not at all fair to the environment. It is a process set up almost to guarantee the approval of power plants wherever they be sited. Local authority is totally over-ridden. "Advisory" opinions only are asked of local authorities such as planning boards and zoning boards, and the EFSB is explicitly empowered to ignore them. Likewise, the opinions asked of various state agencies are advisory too. And nowhere is this usurpation of local and state authority more prejudicial to the environment than in the EFSB's power to ignore the opinion of the Department of Environmental Management.

Yes, Senator, in the vital question of an energy project’s impact on the ecology of the surrounding landscape, you would think that "the process" would mandate  a formal Environmental Impact Statement process for power plant siting. But it doesn't. The EFSB's power in the matter is arbitrary. It can order an EIS or not. Regarding the Clear River Energy Center, it has not. The only evidence that will be admitted in defense of those 25 square miles of protected forest bordering the Invenergy site will be the mere "opinion" of our woefully understaffed, underfunded DEM. Some friends you have at the EFSB, Senator!

This isn't a tempest in a teapot, Senator, it is a calumny! Because once upon a time, in the case of the first power plant the EFSB vetted, the Board did order a formal Environmental Impact Statement. And not only was this case in Burrillville, but a part of this EIS examined and passed judgment upon the very site where Invenergy proposes to build its 1,000 megwatt plant today.

In 1987, the Energy Facility Siting Board was brand new when the Ocean State Power Co. applied to build a 560 mw power plant on a site in northeast Burrillville, six miles distant from today’s Invenergy proposal. Whatever the spur---youthful idealism, I suppose---the Board ordered an EIS to be conducted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission with the assistance of the EPA and the US Fish & Wildlife Service. The process was fair and thorough, and the outcome was a siting decision satisfactory to nearly everyone, including all the major environmental organizations most of the citizens of Burrillville.

But most relevant, Senator, to Invenergy's case today, is that the FERC EIS mandated the study of viable alternatives to OSP's "preferred" site, should that preferred site be rejected. And one of those alternatives, Senator, was the very same Algonquin pipeline company land where Invenergy wants to build now.

Yes!

Known as the “Buck Hill Road” site, it was studied and rejected as an alternative finalist exactly on account of its proximity to those 25 square miles of state and privately protected forests. The plain English last word was written by DEM biologist, Chris Raithel, "On the basis of what I know of these sites I have listed, this seems by far the most inappropriate location for a power plant."

So there you have it, Senator, should you choose to tuck in: That most delectable of political dishes, exquisitely prepared crow.

The vaunted "process" is not the least bit fair or thorough, and a lot of voters who own those public lands are mad as hell about it, and not inclined to give quarter unless you are prepared to dine.

Bill Eccleston is a resident of North Providence, a native of Burrillville, Co-chair of that town's first Comprehensive Plan in 1988, intimately acquainted with the power plant site and its surrounding forest, active against the power plant from the git-go.

 

Related Slideshow: RI Democrats React to Trump’s Budget - 2017

View Larger +
Prev Next

Gina Raimondo 

RI Governor 

"Rhode Island is making strong progress to provide our people with the education and job training they need to be successful and to expand access to affordable, quality health care to virtually everyone in our state. 

President Trump's budget betrays Rhode Islanders by giving huge tax cuts to corporations and the wealthiest Americans while drastically reducing federal funding for vital programs that create jobs, raise wages, and protect low-income Americans. 

Even as we analyze President Trump's budget in the coming days to determine its specific impacts on Rhode Island, I appreciate the members of Rhode Island's Congressional Delegation for their leadership and advocacy, and I join them in calling on their colleagues in Washington, D.C. to stop the Trump administration from making massive cuts to health care, public schools, affordable housing, and other programs that Rhode Islanders rely upon."

View Larger +
Prev Next

Jim Langevin 

U.S. Congressman

“In March, President Trump released a budget outline that I strongly condemned for its drastic cuts to programs that help everyday Americans. Unfortunately, the President’s full budget proposal continues these harmful policies by gutting programs that invest in our economy, create jobs and provide crucial assistance to families across the country. 

This proposal slashes funding for education, food assistance and health care for low-income seniors, children and people with disabilities. It makes cuts to worker training, environmental protection, and investments in medical research and advanced manufacturing. These are not mere luxuries, but programs that make meaningful differences in the lives of Rhode Islanders. 

Congress must reject this cynical and misguided budget. Instead, we should work together in a bipartisan manner, as we did on the recently passed 2017 funding bill, to find a balanced approach to funding priorities that will support families, promote economic growth and provide for our national security.”  

View Larger +
Prev Next

David Cicilline

U.S. Congressman

“If a budget is a statement of your priorities and values, then Donald Trump’s budget shows he doesn’t understand the challenges facing honest, hardworking Rhode Islanders. This is a budget written by the wealthiest Americans for the benefit of the wealthiest Americans. But it’s a setback for the middle class. It makes life harder for anyone who’s trying to punch a ticket to the middle class.”

Donald Trump has already proposed a huge tax cut for billionaires. But the budget he released today says everyone else is on their own. This budget eliminates hundreds of millions of dollars for job creation. It zeroes out funding for workforce training and good-paying manufacturing jobs in Rhode Island. And it makes it even harder for young people to succeed by cutting teacher training, eliminating afterschool funding, and making it harder to pay off student loans.”

This budget does nothing to address Rhode Island’s crumbling infrastructure. It eliminates the TIGER grant program, which is critical to supporting local infrastructure projects like the new commuter rail station in Pawtucket. And it cuts funding for public transit by $928 million.”

And most worrisome of all, this budget makes our towns and cities less safe. It actually cuts funding for firefighters. It cuts billions from the EPA and other resources to protect the water we drink and the air we breathe. And it slashes $978 million from the Army Corps of Engineers – meaning Rhode Island will be less prepared for hurricanes and have fewer resources to protect the quality of our waterways.”

Plain and simple, this is not a budget that any Member of Congress should be comfortable supporting. Along with my colleagues in the House Democratic Leadership, I will do everything I can to reverse these devastating cuts and shape a budget that invests in the future of our country and puts honest, hardworking families first.”

View Larger +
Prev Next

Sheldon Whitehouse 

U.S. Senator

“This budget is reckless, plain and simple. The President proposes massive cuts to Medicaid, breaking yet another campaign promise. He seeks to decimate the federal government’s central command in the battle against the opioid crisis affecting communities from Burrillville to Westerly. He pursues tens of billions of dollars in cuts to student loans and loan forgiveness programs.

His plan would slash funding for research into life-saving cures; lay waste to endowments that support Rhode Island’s world-class cultural institutions; hamstring the EPA so big polluters can poison our air and water; and weaken NOAA, sapping critical resources for coastal economies like Rhode Island’s. The list goes on.

These senseless, irresponsible choices serve one purpose: to pave the way for tax cuts for the very wealthiest.  The good news is that this extremist proposal will go nowhere in the Senate. I look forward to moving past this political stunt of a budget and working on one the American people will support.”

View Larger +
Prev Next

Jack Reed 

U.S. Senator

“President Trump’s budget is bad news for Rhode Island because it weakens our economy and places new burdens on families, businesses, and communities across the country. 

The Trump budget takes a less is more approach: less investment in education, health care, transportation and safety for the general public and more pollution, outsourcing jobs overseas, and tax breaks for the wealthy and well-connected.

This irresponsible budget would be a real setback for middle-class families and seniors in particular.  The $800 billion in Medicaid cuts could cause over 10 million low-income Americans to lose their health coverage.  If this budget were enacted, more elderly Americans could be forced to go from assisted living to living on the streets.  That is immoral and ill-advised.

The Trump cuts also threaten federal funding for public education, medical research, job training and economic development. These cuts are counterproductive and won’t achieve real cost-savings.  In fact, they would impede economic growth.

Families with limited incomes who are trying to make ends meet get hit hardest by the Trump budget.  It takes food, health care, and retirement security away from children, seniors, and people with disabilities while adding funds for an ineffective border wall and tax cuts for millionaires.  It eliminates the LIHEAP energy assistance program, Community Development Block Grants, and many other critical, cost-effective programs that have a positive impact on Rhode Island. 

While our military deserves to be well-funded, cutting diplomacy and foreign aid won’t help prevent war.  These are the wrong priorities for America and don’t reflect our core values.

I will work with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to fight these disastrous cuts and enact a more balanced, fiscally responsible budget that focuses on job creation and strengthening the middle-class.”

 
 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
 

Sign Up for the Daily Eblast

I want to follow on Twitter

I want to Like on Facebook